![]() A charity could have a four-star rating but also be on the watchlist, Thatcher said. Last year, Charity Navigator placed the foundation on its watchlist, a feature it added in 2014. After what Thatcher described as "unprecedented demand" for a rating for the Clinton Foundation, Charity Navigator asked the foundation to consolidate its tax forms in a way the watchdog could evaluate it. "We don't want money from charities we rate, because we believe in being an independent charity watchdog," he said.Ĭharity Navigator stopped rating the Clinton Foundation entirely in 2014 because it said changes in the foundation's business structure were incompatible with the way Charity Navigator calculates its ratings. Charity Watch has no connection to the Clinton Foundation, said its president, Daniel Borochoff. Another charity watchdog, Charity Watch, previously gave the Clinton Foundation an "A'' rating on a scale of A-F. ![]() The Clinton Foundation and Clinton campaign could not immediately be reached for comment.Ĭharity Navigator currently evaluates 8,351 charities, and most get a three-star rating.Īccording to its 2014 consolidated tax report, the Clinton Foundation spends about 12 percent of its budget on running the foundation. It was dinged on two minor issues, its donor privacy policy and its process for determining the chief executive officer's salary. In the Clinton Foundation's case, it scored 94.74 out of 100. It looks at the financial health of charities and their accountability and transparency. The rating itself is a fixed algorithm, described in detail on the watchdog's website. The downgrade came the same year that Charity Navigator was a member of the Clinton Global Initiative. Charity Navigator requires five independent board members, but the foundation had only three during the 2009 fiscal year, Thatcher said. In 2012, it also evaluated the charity on accountability and transparency. ![]() ![]() Its original four-star rating was based on the foundation's financial health and performance. The watchdog had previously rated the Clinton Foundation with four stars in 2007, and in 2012 downgraded it to three stars due to changes in its methodology. The Clinton campaign said Clinton would have met with the donors, anyway, in her role as secretary of state. An AP analysis found that of 154 people outside government with private interests who met or spoke to Clinton by phone, 85 had contributed either personally or through their organizations to the foundation. The four-star badge comes at a time when the Clinton Foundation is under intense scrutiny about whether Clinton granted donors access at the State Department. veterans, journalism integrity and Islamic outreach, but Charity Navigator did not contribute money as part of that effort.Ĭharity Navigator's president, Michael Thatcher, told The Associated Press that the Clinton campaign did not influence the rating. The Clinton group said Charity Navigator committed to spend an estimated $2 million over four years through 2016 to review more charities and provide more detailed information about them in its reviews.Ĭharity Navigator also participated in a Clinton Global Initiative program in 2011 with other groups to identify worthy charities for U.S. It was itself a member of the Clinton Global Initiative between 20. It was not intended to reflect whether Hillary Clinton kept donors to her family's foundation at appropriate arm's length or provided favored access as secretary of state.Ĭharity Navigator is a leading and respected organization that evaluates and rates charities so donors can make informed decisions about contributions. The rating is based on annual federal tax documents. The Clinton Foundation received four out of four stars - the highest rating that Charity Navigator gives after a close look at a charity's finances. Account icon An icon in the shape of a person's head and shoulders.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |